Overview
Skej provides AI scheduling assistants that you CC on emails or share via a booking link to coordinate meetings automatically. The assistants check availability, propose times, send invites, reschedule, and follow up across email, Slack, Teams, SMS, and WhatsApp.
Our take
Skej is an email-based scheduling assistant on a modest per-user subscription with a short trial. Like all scheduling assistants it removes genuine coordination overhead, and like all of them it occasionally books something wrong. Keeping confirmation review on for external meetings is the setting that makes the difference.
Worth it if
Individuals and small teams coordinating meetings by email across organisations.
Look elsewhere if
Internal scheduling where shared calendars make a free booking link sufficient.
✨ Features
Email Assistant
CC the assistant on any thread to book, reschedule, and manage meetings hands-free.
Booking Link
Shareable scheduling pages where the assistant chats live to find optimal times.
Multi-Platform Integration
Works with Google Calendar, Outlook, Slack, Teams, Zoom, and Gmail.
Auto Follow-Ups
Persistently follows up with attendees until meetings are confirmed.
⚖️ Pros & Cons
Pros
Cons
💰 Pricing
Free Forever
$0
- 1 booking link
- Daily agenda and reminders
- 7-day trial of email assistant
Pro
$15 /mo
- Per user, billed annually
- Email assistant
- Unlimited booking links
- Hide Skej branding
Premium
$23 /mo
- Per user, billed annually
- Custom assistants
- Unsupervised mode
- Team admin tools
Enterprise
Custom
- Dedicated support
- Additional security
- Custom integrations
Categories
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
How does it handle ambiguous scheduling language?
Reasonably for clear requests and unreliably for ambiguity — 'next Tuesday' near a month boundary, tentative agreement, an unstated time zone. Those are exactly where a wrong booking happens with a real person. Confirmation review before sending is the cheap safeguard that covers the cases that matter.
Does it need access to my whole inbox?
Usually to the threads it is included in rather than everything, and the scope is worth checking. An assistant with broad mailbox access can see contracts, client confidences and personal information belonging to people who never agreed. Prefer per-thread inclusion over blanket access wherever the product supports it.