Harvey

AI platform purpose-built for legal and professional services

Freemium Enterprise

Overview

Harvey is an AI platform built specifically for legal professionals. It assists with contract analysis, legal research, due diligence, document drafting, and knowledge management. Used by top law firms and in-house legal teams worldwide, Harvey understands legal context, citations, and professional standards.

⚡ Enterprise 💵 Custom Pricing - contact sales for enterprise deployment 📅 Listed 10 Jun 2026

Our take

Harvey is AI built specifically for legal and professional services, sold through enterprise deployment. Domain specialisation matters more in law than almost anywhere else, because the failure mode — a confidently fabricated citation in a filing — has produced sanctioned lawyers. Grounding in real legal sources with verifiable citations is the property that counts.

Worth it if

Law firms and legal departments with the scale to justify enterprise deployment and training.

Look elsewhere if

Solo practitioners and small firms — the deployment model assumes an organisation.

✨ Features

Legal Research

AI-powered research across case law, statutes, and legal databases.

Contract Analysis

Reviews and analyzes contracts, identifying risks and key provisions.

Document Drafting

Generates legal documents, memos, and briefs based on firm standards.

Knowledge Vault

Centralizes firm knowledge and work product for AI-powered retrieval.

⚖️ Pros & Cons

Pros

✓ Purpose-built for legal with deep domain expertise
✓ Enterprise-grade security and compliance
✓ Trusted by top global law firms

Cons

✗ Enterprise-only pricing, no self-serve plans
✗ Focused on legal, not general-purpose AI

💰 Pricing

Enterprise

Custom

  • Full platform access
  • Custom AI model training on firm data
  • Enterprise security and SSO
  • Dedicated implementation team
  • Contact sales for pricing

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Does specialisation actually prevent hallucinated citations?

It reduces them substantially when answers are retrieved from a real legal database and linked to the source, rather than generated from the model alone. It does not eliminate the need to verify. Every citation should resolve and say what the document claims before anything leaves the firm — that duty stays with the practitioner.

What does client confidentiality require from a vendor?

A contract excluding training on your content, a stated retention period, ideally zero-retention processing, a data processing agreement, and clarity on sub-processors and data location. Professional confidentiality obligations do not relax because a privacy page is reassuring, and the duty to supervise technology sits with the practitioner in most bars.