AIundetect combines an AI-text detector with rewriting tools intended to make drafts read more naturally. Users can analyze text, choose a rewriting style, and review revisions. Detector scores and the vendor's undetectability claims are not guarantees; edited content still needs human review.
⚡ Detector💵 Freemium: free allowance; monthly Basic $15, Standard $25, Pro $45; yearly offers available📅 Listed Sep 16, 2026
Our take
AIundetect analyses AI-text signals and rewrites drafts through a credit-based humanizer, which is the same both-sides-of-the-problem structure that recurs in this corner of the market. The detection side is unreliable, as all text detection is, and the rewriting side exists to evade checks rather than to improve writing.
Worth it if
Little we can recommend — the analysis is unreliable and the rewriting is evasion.
Look elsewhere if
Academic submissions or client work, where you have made a representation about authorship.
✨ Features
AI Text Detection
Analyzes submitted writing for signals associated with AI-generated text.
Text Rewriting
Rephrases drafts using selected writing styles.
Auto-Perfect Mode
Offers an additional refinement workflow on supported subscriptions.
History & Limits
Stores prior tasks and provides plan-specific word and request allowances.
Because one creates demand for the other, which is worth noticing when assessing either. A vendor selling a detector and a tool to defeat it has no incentive for the detector to be accurate. It also illustrates why detection scores cannot function as evidence in the first place.
Does rewriting change whether something counts as misconduct?
No. Where you have agreed to a policy on AI use, the submitted text is still not yours; only the likelihood of detection changed. Institutions increasingly treat evasion as an aggravating factor, and they are moving toward drafting history and oral verification precisely because text classification does not work.